Context over counts.
Sources behind the answers.
The market splits in two: tools that score what an AI assistant said about you, and tools that count mentions. Neither explains the source conversations behind the AI answers. Few do it with EU hosting as a default.
Five things that are different by design.
Built for public affairs, not purchase consideration.
Most AI-visibility tools were built for consumer and B2B marketing teams, and their metrics show it: visibility scores and share of voice measure purchase consideration. Public-affairs work asks a different question: how a policy debate is framed, how your positions are represented, and what an adversarial actor would amplify. Eidoscore is built around that question.
We show the variance, because your board will find it anyway.
Ask a language model the same question twice and you get two different answers. A single visibility score averages away exactly the uncertainty a serious reader will probe. Eidoscore runs each prompt repeatedly, reports the range, and keeps every raw answer as evidence. If the runs disagree, you see that they disagree.
How we measureEU-native by architecture, not adaptation.
EU hosting, GDPR-aligned retention and a default of monitoring topics rather than individuals are design decisions, not a compliance page written afterwards. Multilingual classification for European languages is part of the build, and a Data Protection Impact Assessment precedes any scaled monitoring of political content.
Security and GDPRNarrative framing, not mention counts.
Knowing you were mentioned is weak. Knowing whether the mention was serious, ironic, hostile, supportive, a question, a review or likely misinformation is what supports a decision. Eidoscore classifies context and clusters related mentions into narratives, so you can see whether a story is growing, fading or moving between platforms.
The sources the other tools do not read.
Public Telegram channels are where many European political narratives form first, and almost no visibility tool reads them. Eidoscore monitors public channels only, never private groups, and joins what is said there to what AI assistants later answer.
| Capability | Output-only AI tools | Traditional listening | Full-stack AI tools | Eidoscore |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI answer monitoring | Yes | limited | Yes | Yes |
| Source conversation depth | — | low | medium | Yes |
| Context-level classification | shallow | mention counts | varies | Yes |
| Narrative clustering across channels | — | — | varies | Yes |
| Human-approved action loop | — | — | partial | Yes |
| EU hosting by default | varies | varies | varies | Yes |
| Built on open-source components | — | — | — | Yes |
This reflects Eidoscore’s designed capability. The product is in active development and available through a private pilot.
Comparative view based on publicly available product information. Categories evolve quickly.
Built so a compliance officer can read the architecture and nod.